Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Critical Thinking Blog 3

I am currently debating whether to analyze a work of scientific literary art or whether to bridge the gap between science, literature and humanism. Trying to stay true to my nature and uphold my philosophy and ideas, I cannot help but be enticed to delve into the subject matter of the potential harmonious marriage of humanistic values and the wonders of science. But then again, as an avid fan of literature, I also cannot neglect to avoid the joy that I receive from reading.


I am indeed in a tight predicament. The only way to be able to solve this problem is to weigh the pros and cons. On one hand, me analyzing literature with scientific themes can be enjoyable to me. But is merely analyzing a work of literature can really convey what my deepest thoughts can express? Is the limitation of a single work of literature can hinder what I want to accomplish? Am I forever bound to be an observer rather than an active participant?


I might have just found my answer! It seems that from my deep reflection, I have accidentally stumbled onto my answer! I have ultimately decided to attempt to create a bridge between humanism and science. I would want to find out what are the repercussions of these connections and how the deeply ingrained association of technology can change mankind.

No comments:

Post a Comment